Top 10 Scientific Inaccuracies in Jurassic Park
- Published on Jun 21, 2018
- Top 10 Scientific Inaccuracies in Jurassic Park
Subscribe: goo.gl/Q2kKrD and also Ring the Bell to get notified // Have a Top 10 idea? Submit it to us here! watchmojo.com/suggest
Probably should have "spared no expense" on the research budget. From the velociraptors' size, to the T-Rex's vision, to the lifting strength of pteranodons, the Jurassic Park franchise definitely prioritizes science fiction over science fact. WatchMojo ranks the top scientific inaccuracies in Jurassic Park.
Watch more great dino-related content here:
Top 5 Myths About Dinosaurs - thexvid.com/video/xwvq-_FaDSs/video.html
Top 10 Jurassic Park Franchise Moments - thexvid.com/video/H5eQpKClLxA/video.html
Top 5 Disgusting Dinosaur Facts - thexvid.com/video/lkonZ5SaNfc/video.html
Check out the voting page for this list and add your picks:
Special thanks to our user MattW128 for suggesting this idea!
List rank and entries:
#10. Most of the Dinosaurs Aren't from the Jurassic Period
#9. Where Did the Extinct Plants Come From?
#8. Pteranodons Couldn't Lift People
#7. T-Rex's Motion Vision
#6. Everything About the Brachiosaurus Scenes
#5. Spinosaurus vs. TRex
#4. The Mosasaurus
#3, #2, #1???
Watch on WatchMojo: watchmojo.com
Check our our other channels!
WatchMojo's Social Media Pages
Get WatchMojo merchandise at shop.watchmojo.com
WatchMojo’s ten thousand videos on Top 10 lists, Origins, Biographies, Tips, How To’s, Reviews, Commentary and more on Pop Culture, Celebrity, Movies, Music, TV, Film, Video Games, Politics, News, Comics, Superheroes. Your trusted authority on ranking Pop Culture.