Video size: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Show player controls
You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link:thexvid.com/user/timedtext_video?ref=share&v=Xrqj88zQZJgYou will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=enThanks.
If the both are blind...what happened.?
This is not graspable
can einstein explain how top-heavy sara ended up looking like a prep school hooker?
If I run at the speed of light, will see Sara's skirt even shorter? How fast I do I have to run to see no skirt at all?
Also, at 8:59 shouldn't it be impossible for Sarah to look at the train while it's falling since it is moving so fast? she would literally break her neck so quikly it would come off, hit the track, and explode like half the earth.
If you want a FREE headache and your not a super smart scientist...watch this video.
لا تزالون مع اينشتاين تطوروا قليلا أعجب أنكم لم تكتشفوا بعد أنه يهذي
I feel so strongly that they are cheating in the explanation. If the train goes through the tunnel then from the point of that boy he should see the train *Becomming* shorter. Because from his point of view it is the rest of the universe IS shorter. And when he enters the darn tunnel he should be abel to draw the conclusion that now the lenght of his train is becomming shorter.Maby I'm stupid but i feel very strongly that they are deviding by ZERO. I cant set my finger on the right spot.
If the train is moving at the speed of light, sara won't see a thing
Wow! how complicated it is to explain and believe such phenomena. But when it comes to the existence of God, it become straight forward to deny it. Stephan Hawking can believe that _"aliens will attack the world and that before the Big Bang, time didn't exist. so when there was no time it was impossible for God to do anything at all (how simple is that!)"_ but can't believe that God exists.
Seriously this video has answered me which nobody answeredGreat job💎💎💎
What about if the train had an infinite rigidity??
Then this would violate the Theory of Relativity.
What was Einstein smoking.
These comments tho, love it.
Instead of resorting to nonrigid bodies, i think it is much easier to understand if you keep in mind that for lengths and distances to shrink the speed of the train has to be CONSTANT. The moment the locomotive hits the exit door at the end of the tunnel it decelerates from whatever speed it was going to a complete stop, but nothing can accelerate or decelerate from a constant speed to zero speed in zero time. The very moment the speed starts decreasing towards zero special relativity length-contraction does not apply anymore and you have to use general relativity. Of course the effect of such sudden (but not instantaneous) deceleration is that the tunnel "resizes" quickly to its original size, that is, the size it had when the train is at rest and neither the train nor the tunnel are moving at a CONSTANT speed relative to one another. QED
The explanation is better but I think u should stop the background music which is quite disturbing..
But Adam's dead! How can they both agree if REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Wait, Adam's a god and can revive himself... ANIMATORS!!!???
And now Sarah's gon' get crushed by that speedy train!
And now Adam's gon' die in that fall O' his
And now Adam's gon' die in there! R.I.P Adam (Rest In Peace)
I prefer The train according the rails viewBecause Sara or Adam were drunks
great video. nice info
Hi I am from India and where you from?Nice video
greeks thought the planets are made of fire. since fire flows above air, then it explains why planets never fall from the sky, but doesn't explain why they never hit each other.is there something above air that holds the planets like boats on the surface of water? yep: the ether. therefore, the ether must be lighter than the fire itself. how does the ether keeps the planets apart?
There's a flaw in your presentation.lets assume that while at rest, the train really fits in the tunnel.if the tunnel appears short when looked at from the train moving at light speed, how will the train still fit inside the tunnel?another question: the tunnel looks small when looked from the train. question is how small?when you look at an object while moving at light speed, the object must be located 10000km away; if is closer, the biologic latency of the eyesight won't detect it.how large is the tunnel when looked upon from at least 10000 km?how far back should the tunnel be, to be able to adjust the focus in order to catch more than a glimpse, say a moving image?from a perspective of an asteroid, there is no motion. the tidal effect of passing through gravitational field is all there is. when it collides, there's still no motion but tidal morphing.moving at the speed of light is equivalent to being at rest. what gives objects otherwise very far away from each other, the dimension and the appearance of closeness is the fact that they're moving so fast in respect to one another that a form of echo or sonic wave (obviously not sonic, but more importantly, the elusive quintessential makes a reentry) makes each object to be perceived from the perspective of another object as close-by and dimensional. we are all virtual objects since we don't belong close to each other. we just don't exist in the same space, so we don't move in any sense other that at light speed. were like the atom cores: existent in our own reference, impossible to put two in the same place or even close-by. yet fusion happens.conclusion: motion as we know it doesn't exist. question is: what does it mean that the train moves?
What if the trains length is of planks length.Will it contract for sarah
More evidence this world is a simulation...
That is one theory.
Wait, if Adam's train falls through the hole, what makes Sarah's perspective more privileged than Adam's perspective. Couldn't we argue that since Adam's perspective is as equally correct as Sarah's, the hole is too small and the train does not fall through the hole at all in both of Adam's and Sarah's reference frames?
ADAM at rest in peace
Insanity! None of this is worth thinking about. Your explanations require a "let's think" ever changing unrealistic imagination stretch. You are correct about 1 thing. Each person sees things from thier own perspective; however no matter how things are percieved there is one one truth and perception has no bearing on its function. Either the train will or won't fit no matter what the human eye thinks.
Though technically these computer graphics require more power to run, I prefer the style of the original theory of relativity video on this channel. thexvid.com/video/ev9zrt__lec/video.html&t=
Bloody hell those graphics though. 🙈
If it was moving at the speed of light her hair'd be gone and her skirt up. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Wtf doesn’t that mean the train will fall through the hole even if lts like 1mm? Would that happen irl if there’s something moving close to speed of light?
tak faham langsung
To hell with astro science.. I don't understand anything in it
Adam would not be trapped, he would be dead!
excellent video, how come some people pressed con? it's more confusing than relativity.
Nothung but useless loud ads evey time. The video was probably deleted
Could you please lose the music in the future...? Very distracting and annoying....
IMO in the last example the train does not fall, even in the POV of Sarah, because it travels to fast to fall: it has too much inertia or escape velocity. So the mental experiment is wrongly formulated and thus the explanation is not valid. Sarah dies as much in that example as Adam does in the second example.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky - OK... ish. But that's not how it is depicted in the video, that's not what Sarah sees.Also in such case I would not talk of a "hole in a bridge", but of "interstellar space", hard to see which way is down in that scenario, really.
If the hole is large enough, for example several light years across, then the train will fall through the hole.
This is so useful as analogy to explain, in terms relativistic, why the Quantum Eraser and even the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiments produce the results that we, as "static" observers see: because for the photons all the process is happens simultaneously, in a perfectly synchronous "now" and perfectly compacted "here" (space-time is absolutely compressed at light speed). Cool.
ask yourself this numbnuts, the radical philosopher einstein, and his nonsense theory supposes not only does "spacetime" exist... but that it "curves." If it "curves".... critical thinking time..... why doesn't it "un-curve" itself??? any guesses?
Nah... I just don't believe it. Einstein must have been blowing snow, or we have no idea what he was trying to tell us.
Ok I'm not watching any more of this just got 50 seconds in and she said Adam is traveling in the opposite direction... What direction is dictating his positive and negative x and y axis here???
Why should the train fall through the hole? If the rest-length of the train is longer than the hole, there is absolutely no reason for the train to fall down. Sarah sees it short only because of it's speed. That doesn't imply the train will actually fall down. This video uses wrong hypothetical examples to explain relativity.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Yes this is correct. We both are making the same point- that train will fall if the the rest-length of hole is longer than rest-length of the train.
As the speed of the train approaches the speed of light relative to the surroundings, the person inside the train will see all the lengths outside the train approach close to zero, including the length of a hole that would otherwise be seen as over a light year across.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky "Long enough" with respect to what? If the hole is light years long, then even the person in the train won't see the hole to be shrunk smaller than the train.
If the hole is long enough, for example several light years across, then the train will fall through the hole.
Even if the train is solid, the force is never transmitted instantly. No need to think of the train as many sections.
9:32 is the most epic game of light speed chicken.
I love math , science, and other logic but It's not good video sorry 😂😂😂😂
Why does Sarah's dress need to be so short? I mean I don't see the need to sexualize a video about special relativity.
I bet Sarah likes trains
In the second example , take Adams point of view , the gap is shorter than the train and hence the train passes easily .Now , take Sarah’s point of view , the train is shorter than the gap ,but from Adams we know that the train must pass the gap. Now device some logic to justify that in Sarah’s case also the train passes the gap.(just like we did the other way round in the video )Does choosing a particular reference frame first dictate the common action between both?Or , are both considerations analysed and the more logically seeming common action is agreed upon ?I know that sounds stupid 😂, but I want to know where I am wrong and what is the link I’m missing !Thanks
While the first example was amazing, I think the explanation could have been much much better. For example, it illustrates one of the fundamental assumptions of special relativity: all observers must agree that events occur. They will simply disagree about when and where those events occur. In this case, the opening and closing of the two gates are two events and hence both Adam and Sarah must agree that they happen. However, they need not agree on when those two events happen. This takes us to the difference between spacelike and timelike events. In Sarah's frame of reference, the opening/closing of the two gates happens simultaneously, meaning that the two events couldn't possibly be causally related and are thus spacelike. And for spacelike events, the order of the events doesn't matter. One of the events could occur before the other, or vice versa, or they could happen at the same time. However, if the two events were causally related (and so timelike), then the results would be very different. For example, if one of the doors closed first and then sent a signal to the other door to close as well, then both Adam and Sarah would have to agree about which door closed first. Now I guess you could ask why the train being inside the tunnel doesn't count as an event, forcing both Adam and Sarah to agree that it happened. And honestly, I don't know. What counts and doesn't count as an event?
yes, but did the tunnel consent?
If various position of observer gives different observation then position is new criteria to define the reallity of incident in various dimensions?
Einsteins postulates are nothing but dealing with perception issues and trying to turn concepts into reality.
That's a common misunderstanding, but sounds silly if one actually knows about physics. His concepts are based on observing reality. I.e. Scientific exeperiment. And then coming up with the math to help explain it. And subsequently testing the predictions. So yeah, your statement makes no sense.
Wolfgang Breitenseher nope no perception issues and no optical illusions in his theory
when does the train stop acting as a solid rectangle and begin to act as many small ones. if i can lift a long pole by only holding one end of it would i not be able to do that at the speed of light, as it would fall apart as the train did ?
Here's something to ponder. Though in theory you couldn't tell which object was moving if they were moving directly toward or away from each other, you CAN tell when they are moving on courses that would mean that one moves in front of another, like a car driving along a street and you sitting on a bench parallel to the street. There's no way to replicate that effect by the car sitting still and you moving toward it, unless you move on a course which is not straight but varies direction. You would have to veer toward the car from one side and then once you got within sidewalk to street distance you would have to make a turn and veer over the other way. Obviously you would notice your varying course due to inertia, like an amusement park ride. So I guess Einstein was wrong if he said you can't tell which object is moving and which isn't, or at least which is moving faster than the other. Unless, like I said, they're either on a collision course or the exact reverse of a collision course. You can work out the relative motion from the time it takes for the object to pass between two lines at certain angles to each other, centered on you, and then the same angle from that point and so on, like a pie sliced up. If it's moving and will pass in front of you, the time will get shorter to pass between each successive two lines at the same angles to each other. You could probably work out how many units in which direction you are moving to how many units in which direction it is moving. I never actually tried it because it would be complicated but it seems logical that it could all be worked out with geometry and mathematics combined with a timer. I don't know whether you could actually tell if you're stationary or not, maybe, especially if there were two or more other objects to calculate the motions of in relation to you. My guess is that nothing in the universe is dead stationary. BTW, I don't see how time could vary in any of this.
Rip Sarah.. she didnt know she wasnt suppose to stand there...
Even with cartoons there will be the same group of humanoids that will not figure out the sience and will launch stupid comments.
That was neat !!! But again I live in New Jersey so trains going through tunnels that are closed off. And over bridges with sections missing, that made me kind of laugh. I'm planning to share this on Facebook with the comment "If Einstein Took NJ Transit"
A section of the bridge missing, again WHY IS THIS VIDEO BEING DONE BY NJ TRANSIT ?!?!
Closing Off The Tunnel !!?!? What is this New Jersey Transit !?!?!
Oh, my brain hurts. I would never have been able to figure THAT out. It's positively twisted.
Yo but what about when the train just entered the tunnel from sarah's perspective but did not hit the far wall yet since it is percieved as much shorter than the tunnel? There are no horizontal forces acting on the train yet, but the whole thing is contained
But if second senario is true and we can take the tunnel and train of any length initially,than doesn't that means that the train as a rigid body is infinitely compresable , because if we take the perspective of Adam and the doors are unbreakable than an infinitely long rigid train must have fitted into the tunnel.And also,if the train is traveling at nearly the speed of light,than according to Adam's perspective,the tunnel must have shrinked to very small place.
Sarah and Adam...there is a Third answer to all of this- Only one is right: The 'difference' is merely optical illusion.
As other commentators have clearly noticed, Sarah is way too hot for the purposes of this video haha.
While it is an interesting choice to olay Wagner wheb talking about a physicist who had to flee the Nazis, explaining the segmentation of the train via a force is misleading, as the effect is of geometric nature. I will also dream of AAAAAAAAAinstaain tonight, I assume. Still an okay explanation which does not miss the opportunity of off-topic-objectifying women.
I read a book on this in 1967. This was a reasonable paradox at the time but has since been mathematically explained to my satisfaction. Unfortunately, you have to dismiss the layman's understanding and instead recognize that many of the statements made are logical, but not mathematically sound.
BTW, if you really want to have some fun with this, then you can use the math to explain what would happen at speeds greater than the speed of light! FTL (faster than light) is not only feasible, but it has been mathematically provable and demonstratable since October 1956 when science first created FTL engines. Yes, that's right. We have had spaceships that go faster than the speed of light since 1956.
So what is the paradox?.. yaawn
makes no sense...how can the train be travelling at anyones perspecive at the speed of light / that train is going 10 miles an hour max....PFTTT
why the train size is different for Adam & Sarah.I'm totally confused!!
You may want to watch my main video on Relativity at thexvid.com/video/ev9zrt__lec/video.html
Witchcraft. This is witchcraft.
Adam is wrong because Sarah (a woman) is always right.
Rubbish to ask, 'will the doors hit the train when closed?'. Physically the train has not changed. It is just an optical illusion depending on where you are standing. Not sure what that has to do with Einstein's theory.
Jan Fellstrom - Design nope this is relativity of simultaneity
For a train going the speed of light, this is a slow ass train
The theory of relativity is incomplete and the truth is that the train exists in a superposition until am observer measures its position, and so for Adam it'll split off into a universe in which the doors don't close at the same time / the train doesn't fall off the bridge, and for Sarah it'll split off into another universe where the train will be crushed inside the tunnel / will fall off the bridge.
Munky Bidness it’s not a coherent state so no
What if from Adam's perspective the special relativity is true, whereas from Sarah's perspective it is false?
So relativity States that if there are two contradictory ideas neither is correct and both are right at the same time. It shows how we can seemingly only understand on a subjective level. Nothing appears to be "universal" except the concept of relativity itself.
DragonBallDave363 oh that’s what you’re saying sorry 😅
Cosmic Rift I get what your saying, but you keep replying with “no”. I’m sorry friend, but the idea of relativity does show how contradictory viewpoints can represent the same thing. Literally one person thinks the tunnel is longer and the other thinks the train is longer. Those are contradictory ideas.
DragonBallDave363 no you will observe certain events. You can check them to be the same in both reference frames by using relativity of simultaneity. From your perspective the inside of the train will never be completely trapped inside tunnel at the same train time. In other words what the train observes.
Cosmic Rift right that’s what I said. Because it varies it’s like complementary contradictions lol. Intuitive what be what you feel, and as the person on the train you would already know the train is longer than the tunnel, but from your perspective of observing (experiment and logic) the tunnel is longer. YOU will go all the way in the tunnel before you come out. It’s just like the question are we coming or going? Based on perspective the answer may vary even though the end result is the same. As you mentioned above. It’s still the same, but the views/ideas can vary. A varying perspective doesn’t change the end result, but opposite views and both point to the same thing. Lol after about 25 we are probably for sure going though huh? Not getting any ginger for sure!!!
Same universe. Same events same laws and same ,,objective interiors´´. They are whats called lorentz invariant. So Relativity lets everything what must be agreed upon by every other observer the same. The perspective however may vary. Relativity of Position over time may seem more intuitive, but it’s no more special than for example relativity of time varying over space. Intuitivity means Nothing only reason and experiment does.
My question is in the 2nd case if adam cross the bridge then it would mean that too short train cross the bridge in sarah perspective. So, the only explanation is time dilation with which Sarah can come up with. SO WHERE IS THE PARADOX?
I can't even see the train
This video is a test of Patience.
Its femimost perspective.ypu al will be dead and see whthppens slaves no you dont deserve to be slave.see what is do dd.
Mehh! Answer is simple. Women are always right. Sarah's always right and Adam is wrong. Just check for yourselves.
Sarah is a thot.
Maybe I've got small brain so I couldn't understand the purpose of this video.
sarah is so hot in that miniskirt
Please get rid of that god-awful music.
Ok, so, it makes sense that a train is made of sections as there is space between atoms and molecules. But it's super weird to think that the harder I acellerate my truck, the shorter it gets. So, if information cannot be transfered faster than light, does that mean a near light speed object with rear end propulsion will look like a pancake while traveling?
I like your videos but they're way too slow. I don't mind speeding them up, but your narrator talks too slow and there are way too many pauses. This could have been a 2 minute video, but even at 2x speed it's still 6.
The door should have to close nearly at the speed of light to do that
Somebody tell me what if I am going at speed of light and turned on my tail lights at my ships back will light be going slower
Okay now I understand the concept. It is much more than time dilation
Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky I watched it thorough...what a video relativity!! I am your new fan now
Light always travels at the same speed for all observers. I describe this in detail in my main video on Relativity. The link is at the top of my TheXvid home page.
No more doors on tunnels.
The reason the train fits inside the tunnel when it hits the closed exit door is nornal crash crumpling. Surely the train would not fall down the gap as its momentum would cause it to fly over the gap?
The last example was not appropriate, do you think anything travelling with nearly the speed of light can get affected with gravity , atleast not for a distance of 10^8 km.
The gap in the track can be very large, much larger than the number you provided.
To me, when something travels approximatly the speed of light. What we sees might shrink or stretch, but that does not translate the actual physical object shrinked or stretched. We sees the object shrink is because the light cannot travel faster than Light speed constant, physically the object does not shrink unless there is seriously heavy gravity working on it like the black hole.CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG... TQ...